Equal Opportunity Hijab

July 27th, 2007
by Mohammed Amin Kholwadia

Muslims have always respected the Quran. Even today Muslims try to show respect for the Quran in so many different ways and in all settings. Muslim ladies from the Indian sub-continent – who do not observe hijab – still drape a scarf (a do-patta) around their necks; and when the Quran is being recited, they instinctively and very affectionately don their do-pattas over their heads. The following account – based on an actual event – illustrates just how Muslims have maintained this level of respect for the Quran even under great duress. For more those who hold more conservative values in life, they might want to appreciate the sincerity in the claims of those who seemingly gloat with the fantasy that they are liberal. However, I must caution Muslim men against ever reenacting the glorious climax.

My family and I usually stay away from attending weddings – unnecessarily. They seem to go for a dime a dozen where we live. We simply had to attend this one particular wedding reception a while back. As we parked our vehicle in the jam-packed parking lot, we began to observe all the glitter and the glamour of the weddings of North America. Women with their flamboyant display of extravagant hijab-based dress suits bounced along with their not so flamboyantly dressed spouses. Children with their eye-catching wedding garments studded with (cheap strands of) glitter raced along only to listen to the screams of their sartorially well-adjusted grand-parents. Amongst all this clatter and clutter of ostentatious euphoria a young man graced the occasion by showing off his true libertine values. At first, I took only a casual interest in this lad who – with great frolic – gaited by us in his magnetic - but somewhat feminine - outfit. My wife – who notices anomalies – made a remark that did not echo the need for Muslims to assimilate and integrate. (Oh, how these two concepts: assimilation and integration have ogled and romanticized with us Muslims!!) However, by the end of the night, the lad made me eat the humble pie and I had to concede my prejudice.

The activities of the night very calmly – and also quite enjoyably – moved along. The bride and bridegroom made their entry with the proverbial Desi majesty; the food was terrific and the ambience applauded the occasion. The official program now had to better everything.

The master of ceremonies introduced a hafiz of the Quran and asked him to bless the last phase of the proceedings with the customary recitation of the Holy Quran. The recitation of the hafiz was truly refreshing. The verses he recited matched the sentiments of the night and the translation that followed did wonders for the spirits of the now ever-focused audience. It would have been perhaps the best introduction to a blessed night except that the young man in the somewhat feminine outfit rose above all expectations and stole our hearts. Several innocent ladies and even more men could not help but marvel at the young man’s daring bravery. This young man spoke volumes on behalf of those of us who think we can neither assimilate nor integrate in an ever-changing and diverse modern society. He showed us all that we can still very easily maintain our dignity and express our religiosity without being too orthodox. As soon as the young man received the Words of the Quran in his ears, with feminine deft and liberal precision, he instinctively and very affectionately rolled his do-patta over his head.

Just Who Are These “Soonees?”

July 27th, 2007
by Mohammed Amin Kholwadia

What makes a Sunni a Sunni?” is a question that is most frequently asked. Shaykh Amin offers a valuable preliminary discussion on the issue.

Islamic knowledge is based on three primary sources. They are:

(1) Revelation from the Almighty to the Last of all Prophets, Muhammad(صلى الله عليه وسلم)

(2) The prophetic intuition of Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم)

(3) The inspired united wisdom of the Companions.

Knowledge derived from these three sources is generally known as traditional Islamic knowledge – or knowledge based on “naql”. A fourth source: analogy – better known as “qiyas – is also included as a primary source and is accepted as a genuine means by which Muslims arrive at Islamic conclusions. However, “qiays’ is not a source but rather a process by which jurists arrive at legal conclusions. Rulings of Muslim scholars based on “qiyas” have served as legal precedents for Muslims.

Revelation from Allah to the Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) came with two very distinct manifestations. The first was in the words of the Quran or The Divine Recitation. The Quran is the only form of “recited revelation” (wahi matloow). The recited revelation was a verbatim rendition of the Almighty’s Word and It rightly assumed Divine status amongst Muslims.

The second manifestation of revelation to the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) came in the form of divinely inspired maxims and codes. Revelation was transmitted to the intellect of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم). The Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) subsequently translated the revelation into words that his companions would be able to understand. This type of revelation Muslim scholars called non-recited revelation, or wahi-ghair matloow. In Muslim history, this second type of revelation has generally been referred to by the term Hadith. However, Muslim scholars have always maintained that both recited and non-recited revelation were authentic religious sources for both the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) and his companions. Neither the Prophet, nor his companions discriminated between the two sources when it came to applying legal rulings based on either of the two. Examples of both are abundantly obvious for even the casual browser. The method of practicing most of the four ritualistic pillars of Islam (salaat; saum; zakaat and hajj) should suffice for the eerie skeptic. The Quran does not mention how these four pillars are to be enacted. The only source by which the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) observed those came from the non-recited type of revelation.

So it is clear that Islamic knowledge and practice for the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) is indeed wahi-based – where non-recited sources are seen as genuine wahi (revelation) also.

It should also become clear that the source of Islamic knowledge and practice for the Companions is actually rasool-based (rasool meaning messenger). The Companions did not have access to revelation themselves but they did witness the revelation to the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) as he taught them their Deen (Islam).

Those who came after the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) relied upon the Companions for their Islamic knowledge and practice. The Companions used their experience with and training from the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) in order to teach their students (who became known as the Tabi’een). The Companions encountered issues that the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) did not. They had to use their knowledge of the rasool (messenger) to give legal verdicts (fatwas). The main task of the scholars amongst the Companions was to make it quite clear to their followers the difference between what was revealed to the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) and what was not. What the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) determined as either part of Deen or germane to it, the Companions saw as part of the Sunnah and implemented it. The establishment of the Khilafah of Abu Bakr by the Companions; the compilation of the Quran by Abu Bakr; the formalizing of the Taraweeh prayers by Umar; the fixing of the Hijri calendar by Umar; the standardization of the dialects of the Quran by Uthman and the quashing of heresies and post-Islamic theories by Ali all prove that the inspired united wisdom of the Companions is an authentic source for Muslims who came after them. Hence, Sunni Muslims have maintained that the actions of the Companions that were unanimously approved and enacted are also part of the Sunnah.

From this is it is clear that for Muslims who come after the Companions, their source of Islamic knowledge and practice has been Sunnah-based. To reiterate: Islamic knowledge is based on three primary sources. They are: (1) revelation from the Almighty to the Last of all Prophets, Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) (both recited and non-recited); (2) the prophetic intuition of Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) and the inspired united wisdom of the Companions.

So the Prophet’s knowledge and practice is wahi-based; the Companions’ Islam is rasool-based. For all others’, including ourselves today, Islam is Sunnah-based. From here we can see why Sunnis call themselves the Ahle Sunnah wal Jamm’ah (the People of the Sunnah and the community).

Hijrah and the Muslim Calendar

July 27th, 2007
by Mohammed Amin Kholwadia

The Quran was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad SAW over a span of twenty three years. The Prophet recited each verse according to Its pre-ordained order in the Lawh Mahfooz (the Protected Tablet). After the Prophet SAW left this world, his Companions compiled - and thus – preserved the Quran in the very order it was recited during the life of the Prophet SAW. Muslims have always held the view that this order of recitation was also divinely inspired and that the Companions preserved the pre-ordained order of recitation. The science that inevitably emerged from this is that of understanding the Nazmul Quran or the literary arrangement of the Quran. In his brilliant exegesis of the Quran (Tafseer Azizi), Shah Abdul Aziz, the erudite protégé and son of Shah Waliyullah of Delhi, notes the genius of the Companions vis-à-vis their understanding the Nazm of the Quran and hence their dexterity in fathoming the meaning of the Quran Itself.

We must understand some historical facts about the pre-Islamic calendar. The year in which the Prophet Muhammad SAW was born was known as the Year of the Elephant. The Year of the Elephant was the year when Abraha came to Makkah with the intent to destroy the Ka’bah. He failed miserably as the Quran notes in Surah al-Fil (105). The Arabs used that year as a point of reference to number their years. But they did not agree to any standard when it came to numbering their months even though their calendar was lunar. Even the period of the Hajj was not specified and consequently, the sacred month of Muharram was also shifted every year. This meant that some years had thirteen months instead of twelve.

The responsibility for announcing the date of the Hajj was entrusted to a man from Banu Kinana named Hudhayfah bin Abd Fuqaym (better know as al-Qalammas). He would announce on the occasion of the Hajj when the next pilgrimage was to be performed, and which month the thirteenth month was to follow. The first Qalammas was an individual, but then the name became specific to the announcer.

Among the Arabs the months of Rajab, Dhu’l-Qa’da, Dhu’l-Hijja, and Muharram were regarded as the months of peace and sanctity. But, with this calendar, these months also began to undergo changes, and it was one of the responsibilities of the Qalammasa to announce as to what months would be the sacred months in the following year. So, when it suited the purposes of the warring tribes, the announcer would declare that their idols had prohibited fighting that year in the month of Muhurram; and the following year, he would announce that the idols had now allowed fighting in the month of Muharram. So the month of Safar (which was not a sacred month) was either postponed or kept on it regular time according to the proclamation of the Qalammas. This was the practice know as al-nasi‘ (postponing/transposing) in Arabic and to which the Quran alludes in Surah al-Taubah (9): 36/37.

The number of months in the sight of Allah is twelve (in a year) - so ordained by Him the day He created the heavens and the earth; of them four are sacred: that is the straight ordinance. So wrong not yourselves therein, and fight the Pagans all together as they fight you all together. But know that Allah is with those who restrain themselves.

Verily the transposing (of a prohibited month) is an addition to disbelief: the disbelievers are led to wrong thereby: for they make it lawful one year, and forbidden another year, in order to adjust the number of months forbidden by Allah and make such forbidden ones lawful. The evil of their course seems pleasing to them. But Allah does not guide those who reject Faith.”

 

The Prophet in his address at the Farewell Hajj announced the abrogation of meddling with the months:

“O people! Time after undergoing a full revolution has returned to its original state1; the day Allah created the heavens and the earth. The year is twelve months – four of them are sacred. Three run consecutively: Dhul Qa’dah; Dhul Hijjah and Muharram; the other is the Rajab of Mudar which comes between Jamadul ‘Aakhir and Sha’baan”.

So the twelve lunar months were ordained - Muharram was left as the first month of the Muslim calendar year. But the determination of the first year of Muslim history did not come about until later. Allamah Sakhawi gives the following details about the origin of the Islamic calendar2:

“A report on the authority of Ibn ‘ Abbas states that there existed no era in Madinah when the Prophet arrived there. People came to use an era a month or two after his arrival. This continued until Muhammad’s death. Then, the use of an era was discontinued, and there was none during the caliphate of Abu Bakr and the first four years of the caliphate of ‘Umar. Then, the (Muslim) era was established.’ Umar is reported to have said to the assembled dignitaries among the men around Muhammad: “The income is considerable. What we have distributed has been without fixed dates. How can we remedy that?” One answer came from al-Hurmuzan. He had been king of alAhwaz. After his capture during the conquest of Persia, he had been brought to ‘Umar and had become a Muslim. He said: “The Persians have a (method of) calculation which they call mahroz and which they ascribe to their Sassanid rulers. The word mahroz was Arabic zed as mu’arrakh, and the infinitive ta’rikh was formed from it.”

Ahmad ibn Hanbal and al-Bukhari report through Maymun ibn Mihran that “an I.O.U. payable in Sha’ban was presented to ‘Umar I. Thereupon ‘Umar asked which Sha’ban, last Sha’ban, or this one or the coming one? Give the people something that they can understand.” He then issued a regular directive and founded the present-day calendar in 16 A.H. from which time the practice is being followed.3

Al-Suyuti, writes with reference to al-Bukari’s Tarikh that Umar asked Allah for Divine Providence (Istikharah) for a month. Thereafter, he consulted Ali ibnAli Talib and had the Hijra dates inserted in all administrative directives two and a half years after his assumption of the Caliphate and this became the practice from 16 A.H. onwards.

The fact that Umar deliberated for a whole month and asked for Divine Providence is proof that he attached great importance in making the right choice for the Muslim Ummah. The fact that he consulted his advisors - especially Ali – proves that he had utmost confidence in the assembly with him and that he refused to act without their unequivocal support. Indeed, the words of the Prophet SAW come to mind:

He who seeks Divine Providence (istikhara) will not be disappointed; he who seeks advice (istashara) will not regret.’

There was no doubt that the beginning of the months was to be determined by the crescent. Both the Quran is Surah Baqarah (2: 189)4 and the practice of the Prophet SAW confirmed that beyond arbitration. But Umar was also quite aware of how serious the matter was since the Quran explicitly preventing believers from fiddling and meddling with time. He wanted to make sure that the both the year he chose and the conference he enacted would stand up to the test of time – literally.

Indeed all nations and civilizations wish to remain constant and consistent in every theory they expound. If a civilization was to choose an inconsistent conference for measuring time itself, it would inevitably succumb to the pressures of time and seek modification and reform. Such was and still is the fate of what is now the ‘mainstream’ current calendar: the Gregorian one. The problem with the Gregorian calendar is that:

‘After every four hundred years seasonal changes occur and probably because of this fact the solar calendar requires constant modification. It is just not possible to remove this discrepancy.

The League of Nations had set up a Special Committee at Geneva in 1923 charged with the formulation of a calendar that would be universally acceptable and would be reconcilable with seasonal changes. One of the recommendations of this Committee was that the year was to be divided into 13 months5. However, such a calendar would not be devised as the seasons in the hemispheres differ in their periodic occurrence. The proximity and the distance of the sun in the East and the West naturally give rise to substantial differences. Because of this inherent discrepancy, it was not possible for the solar calendar to gain universal acceptance.6

Having already accepted the lunar cycles as a conference to determine the months, Umar did not immediately find any specific mandate regarding fixing a year from which to chronicle Muslim history.

Umar, along with the other Companions of the Prophet SAW, resorted to looking into the life of the Prophet SAW. They wanted to give Islam its true place in history and that was not possible without revering the Prophet SAW himself. It was their insatiable love for their leader that shook off any and every consideration that was not exclusive to him SAW. They looked into the year in which the Prophet SAW was born and the year in which he died. They could not come to terms with those years as the birth of a prophet was not exclusive to the Prophet Muhammad SAW. Other prophets were born and they all passed away – save one (Isa) who will also pass away. They looked into the year when the Quran was revealed first. They did not choose that conference either since revelation came to other prophets and hence it was not exclusive to our Prophet SAW. After a month of tremendous exertion (ijtihad) and through istikhara and istishara, Umar was guided by the Nazm (order) of the verses of the Quran to a unique solution.

The verses in Surah Taubah that speak of the year consisting of twelve months are followed by a didactic call towards sacrifice in the path of Allah.

If you do not help not (your leader), (it is no matter): for Allah did indeed help him, when the disbelievers drove him out: he had no more than one companion; they two were in the cave, and he said to his companion, “ Do not grieve, for indeed Allah is with us “: then Allah sent down His peace upon him, and strengthened him with forces which you did not see, and humbled to the depths the word of the disbelievers. But the word of Allah is exalted to the heights: for Allah is Exalted in might, Wise.” (Surah Taubah (9): 40)

Umar realized that there was a link between the verses that spoke of the twelve months and the story referenced in verse 40. He saw the pre-ordained order of recitation as giving him an ordinance for his case. Time for Muslims had to be regulated by an acquired act of a human that transcended time itself. The revelation of the Quran to the Prophet was not an acquired act. Human beings are not capable of following the act of revelation. Likewise, birth and death are divinely regulated and human beings cannot determine the birth day or the date of death for each other. Similarly, the Night of Isra and Mi’raj (Ascension) was not something the Ummah could copy. Being the role model for Muslims in their affairs, the Prophet SAW showed the community that if they followed his footsteps in matters relating to time, they would be universally accepted. Hence, Umar concluded that the Hijrah of the Prophet SAW, the story of the Prophet’s flight and migration from Makkah to Madinah was an act that could be and should be commemorated every year. It was a journey into the unknown; it was riddled with so many intangibles that they were almost uncountable. The Messenger of Allah (SAW) threw himself into the infinite mercy of the Unseen and voluntarily left all tangible consequences to the Creator of time (Al-Dahr).

Being severely compromised by his own people in Makkah, Muhammad SAW – through Divine Providence – instructed his followers to migrate to Yathrib – a small town north of Makkah – which later became known as Madinah. Muslims obliged and left their relatives and belongings in Makkah and sought refuge in the unknown dimensions of Yathrib. The Prophet SAW and his best companion, Abu Bakr, were among the last to leave Makkah. Their strategy was to hide in a cave (called Thaur) south of Makkah in the hope that the Makkans if they were to search for him, would veer northward. They did not. The Makkans found out that they had headed south and followed their trail all the way up to the mouth of the cave. There was nothing shielding the entrance of the cave except a flimsy spider’s web7 that could have been demolished by a nonchalant sneeze of the posse. Ironically, the defenseless companions of the cave were guarded by a device that cannot be protected itself: the spider’s web. “If they had entered,” said the Makkans, “they would have broken the web.” But it was their web that was broken.

These moments of extreme exposure had infinite consequences for the two companions of the cave. History stood still but time was re-energized by the words of the Prophet to the concerned Abu Bakr: “Do not grieve, for indeed Allah is with us.” Abu Bakr’s expedited and precarious grief was that if they were caught, history indeed would stand still as Islam would definitely perish without Muhammad SAW. The Prophet’s timeless faith in Allah embodied Divine Ordinance and Providence that still relentlessly withstands the test of modern times.

Umar saw that this event was the event upon which the fulcrum of Muslim time would revolve. He read the verse: “If you do not help (your leader), it is no matter…” as pushing him to appreciate Allah’s assistance in time over time. From the outside looking in, any neutral observer would have called the end of Islam in the cave of Thaur. From a universal standpoint, Umar observed the infinite powers of the Unseen delivering the living from imminent death in the cave. Islam’s apparent and imminent death was replaced by Islam’s unassailable birth and growth. The Quran repeatedly reminds us of this phenomenon: “He (Allah) extracts the living from the dead…” The Hijrah of the Prophet SAW and, by association, of Abu Bakr rejuvenate believers every time they pass by that time of the year.

The story of the Hijrah is preceded by an ordinance not to meddle with time. It would necessarily follow that the Hijrah was already ordained by Allah to be the conference upon which Muslims were to set their calendar. So by reading into the pre-Ordained order of the verses of the Quran, Umar and the Companions of the Prophet SAW found order in their world. By understanding the Nazm (order) of the verses of the Quran according to how the Prophet SAW recited It, Umar and the Companions wrote their names in the annals of history and time.

 

(to be continued)

1 This prophetic revelation that time (zaman) itself was in it own orbit (istadara) is an abstract for those who wish to study the Islamic theory of time.

2 Hakim Muhammed Said: Hamdard Islamicus: 1981

3 ibid

4 “They ask thee concerning the New Moons. Say: They are but signs to mark fixed periods of time in (the affairs of) men, and for Pilgrimage”

5 The resurgence of the practice of al-Nasi (intercalation) in modern times?

6 Hakim Muhammed Said: Hamdard Islamicus, 1981

7 The Quran Itself states in the Chapter of the Spider: “…truly the flimsiest of houses is the spider’s house… (Surah al-Ankabut (41: 29)